Monday, December 22, 2008

2008.12.22

Hi. Hello? Still there? Wow... for a second (or more like 3 months), I thought you had left.

I know I know... it's been a while since I've added anything new to this corner of cyberspace, and although some of you may have been eagerly waiting to get your hands on more of Bho's nonsensical ramblings, I cannot promise any quality to this long-awaited entry.

I'm going to skip the diary-like recap of the past 3 months. I think that's what Facebook is best used for. It provides a fairly frequent update of status messages and photos that succinctly capture my mood and the happenings in my life. I insist that this blog should be kept to insights and musings not about me. In such, I'm contemplating changing the name of this blog, and would like to solicite your suggestions.

First though, here's the obligatory eye candy I found online (sorry I forget the source and so can't cite it... would appreciate if you could help me out here):


Yes, it's not beautiful in the classical sense, and especially not beautiful in my fellow architects' eyes, ones that have been thoroughly trained to be judges of beauty. It could also be refined and made clearer. However, I like the fact that it is messy and adequately effective, allowing a LOT of people to read and to understand it quickly and thoroughly. More so, it characterizes the way that most people who aren't trained graphic designers can process information. I don't endorse messy, but heck, a lot of times messy works.

As I have spent the past 3 months studiously immersed in my studies of the elegant Chinese language (as well as other stuff like accounting, corporate finance, marketing, etc.), I guess I should at least write a bit about my thoughts on studying a language. But then I thought about an even better idea. I could kill two birds with one stone if I wrote in Chinese on this blog instead. I would be adding content and practicing my Chinese at the same time. And so for all of you without Big5 encoding (or don't know what that is), I've Google-translated a version below for you to muse over and guess its butchered meaning.

But... before I begin, just one thought on something I read in my Econ textbook the other day. A sample problem in the book illustrated a simple supply and demand calculation, pointing out what are the equilibrium price and quantity ($10 and 28 million tons) given the supply and demand curves. Simple math; no sweat. Then the problem proceeded to ask what would the new equilibrium price and quantity be if demand increased from by 15 million tons. The mathematical solution was also quite easy to understand, giving a new price and quantity at $13 and 37 million tons. But doesn't it seem fishy that the new equilibrium quantity is less than what the increase in quantity suggests? Why 37 million tons if someone explicitly said quantity will increase to 28 + 15 = 43 million tons? Anyone who has studied Econ knows that the academic answer, of course, has to do with the elasticity of demand. Namely, some people who are more flexible in their product demand might get priced out, and therefore the new equilibrium quantity is less than stated / forecasted. Yet even though I understand both the theory and the math, the sample problem (a fairly typical one I'm sure) does not sit well with me. Why would anyone forecast a figure greater than they know will exist? And how should both the theory and the math be corrected to solve for this accurate demand rather than an inflated figure? I'm sure there's a simple answer to this, and for all you Econ / Finance buffs, please tell me.

And now... onto the Chinese language portion...

在中国学中文已经有三个多月. 可以说,
进展还好, 但是当然可以更好的了. 对我来说, 学中文最容易的地方就是拼音系统. 最难的地方是记得每个字的声调. 特别对我来说, 我是一个比较用视觉学东西的人, 不是一个有很强听觉得人. 所以一般来说, 别人说话的时候, 我是较难听得出每个字的声调. 如果写下来的话, 那就比较容易很多了.

还有另外的问题就是我的一半广东口音, 一半北美口音. 很多时候我和别人说话时, 他们立即知道我不是本地人. 再困难的一方面是北京是一个很多元化的城市. 有北京人是理所当然, 但还有很多从外省来的人. 例如从四川, 河北, 东北等等. 每个地方的人也有他们的口音. 这方面是和学英文有分别的. 英国, 美国, 澳大利亚每个国家都有自己的口音. 但是在每一个国家内, 口音的变化虽然有, 但是并不大. 不像在北京, 和每一个人说话都可能会遇到听不懂的口音.

有很多时候, 别人会问我喜欢北京或是香港或是美国. 这个是廷难回答的问题, 因为不是苹果对苹果的比较. 北京有很多要改善的地方, 但是它最使人们瞩目的是可以看见历史在改写的过程. 世界上没有很多地方的发展可以和北京比较. 就像一个在成长中的孩子一样, 一定有得有失. 但是这个是一生难以目击的机会. 那么怎样可以不参与呢?

说到历史的题目, 2008 年真的是难忘记的一年. 个人来说, 最大的改变当然是毕业和找新的事业方向. 国际上也发生很多值得重温的事情. 其中三件特别特出的是北京奥运会, Obama在大选获胜, 和今年的经济低迷困境. 每件事情都深深影响到世界上的很多人. 但是, 影响和参与是两个事情. 很多人, 包括我在内, 都是旁观者, 不是参与者. 但是今年 Obama 的胜利真的让全球市民觉得自己也有一个责任对世界作出贡献和制做改变. 但是怎样我们才可以做历史的参与者, 不只是旁观者呢?

有时候我觉得我的这一辈, 就是80年代之后出生的人, 实在有一点 complacency. 可能因为我们想得到的东西并不是太难得到, 也使我们的要求也比较低了. 也可能因为我们很小要面对困境. 但是我们是活在一个特殊的环境下. 我们要拿到的资源差不多是无限的. 如果我们可以拿起多一点动力, 对自己和对别人的要求也提高的话, 我们作出的贡献和留下的脚印就会更有意思. 当然, 不是每个人都追求同一些东西,同一种生活方式. 也不是每个人都 complacent. 但是在中国生活就必会目击到这儿的人对生活或生存的动力和期望. 一般来说, 已发展的国家是比不上的.

写到这儿就好了. 也是时候我吃饭了. 希望下次不要再等三个月才再写博客吧.



(And as promised, the Google-translation version. This is awesome in its hilarity!)


Learning Chinese in China have more than three months. It can be said that good progress, but, of course, can be better. For me, learning Chinese is the easiest place Pinyin system. Is the most difficult to remember every word Tone. To me, in particular, I use a more visual learning things, instead of listening to feel a very strong person. Therefore, in general, others say, I find it more difficult to hear every word out of tone. If you write it down, then it becomes a lot easier.

The problem is that there is another half of my Cantonese accent, half of the North American accent. I have a lot of time and others say, they immediately know I am not a local. On the one hand, is no longer difficult to Beijing is a very diverse city. Beijingers have Is a matter of course, but there are many people who come from other provinces. For example, from Sichuan, Hebei, north-east, and so on. Each of the local people have their own accent. This is science and English are different. Britain, the United States, Australia each The country has its own accent. But in every country, although there are changes in the accent, but not great. Unlike in Beijing, and everyone will encounter the words did not understand the accent.

There are a lot of time, other people would ask me like Beijing or Hong Kong or the United States. Ting is the difficult question to answer, because Apple is not a comparison of apples. Beijing, many areas to improve, but most people's attention is To see to rewrite history in the process. Not many places in the world, the development of Beijing and can be compared. Just like a growing child, you win some and lose some. But this is a difficult life witnessed. Then how can it not take part ?

Talking about the history of the subject, in 2008 it is really hard to forget a year. Personally, the biggest change is, of course, graduation and find a new career direction. The international community has a lot of merit review. One of three special special The Beijing Olympics is out, Obama won the general election, and this year's economic predicament. Everything deeply affected many people in the world. However, the influence and participation are the two things. A lot of people, including myself, Are spectators, not participants. But this year, Obama's victory in the world do the people feel that they have a responsibility to contribute to the world and making change. But what we can do the history of the participants, not just a spectator this ?

Sometimes I think my generation is born after the 80s, is a little complacency. Because we may think of things not to be too difficult, but also to our relatively low. May also be because we are Small to face difficulties. But we live in a special environment. We have to get the resources are almost limitless. If we can pick up a little more momentum on its own and other people's demands to improve, we made And contribute to the footprints left behind will be more interesting. Of course, not everyone with the pursuit of something with a way of life. Everyone is not complacent. But in China there must be witnessed to the life of the people living here or The driving force for survival and expectations. Generally speaking, the developed countries is less than the.

Wrote here just fine. I also had to eat. I hope next time will not wait another three months to write your blog.

Friday, September 26, 2008

2008.09.26 (ii)

You gotta read this, and find the youtube video too.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/26/us/politics/26watch.html?ex=1380168000&en=0cf10cc13dcffabd&ei=5124


Although difficult to fathom, there's a statistical chance that Sarah Palin could in fact be VP of the US, and potentially even leader of the free world should McCain step down. WOW! She's unbelievably incoherent and, well, dumb.

2008.09.26

On today's agenda: (not sure)

It's been exactly a month since my last post here. I've been lazy, and have had difficulty conceptualizing writing material. Topics have either been too trivial, too comical, or too serious. I simply haven't been able to set a direction for which this blog should follow, yet at the same time, cannot fathom my last entry here is my architecture obituary. How can I leave on such a solemn and ambiguous note? And so here is my attempt to resuscitate life into this dimming blog.

Frankly, not much has happened in the past month (personally at least), and I don't want to maintain an online diary here. I attended Cory and Leah's wedding in Vancouver, which was fabulous, and also had the chance to catch up with old friends - all the while finding out more about them and myself as well. I've also been busy planning for my imminent but temporary move to Beijing in an attempt to beefen up my Mandarin skills in preparation for my career ahead.

And oh, before I forget, here's an image from the end of July when I was in Shanghai:


The photo was taken abroad a Maglev train from the city to the airport, peaking at 430 km / h. The trip took less than 7 mintues, and at one instance, an identical train traveling the opposite direction passed by. As I was looking out the opposite window, I didn't see the train pass by at all, but rather only heard a loud "BOOM", and that was it. Two trains travelling at such speeds in opposite directions net a relative speed of ~ 860 km / h, or about 2/3 of supersonic speed. The "BOOM" was both startling and exhilirating.

With that aside, back to me.

In my inaugural post, the economy was one of the topics which I listed as an area of interest that would make its way into my entries. The past month in particular has provided no lack of news and commentary on which I could further add my 2 cents, but frankly, I'm not really in any position to offer intelligent insight onto the matters. I wish I was, but I won't pretend to be. Fannie, Freddie, Lehman, and effective today, WaMu are all gone, and countless others are probably only clinging to their last breaths of life. Henry Paulson and Ben Bernanke are trying their best to convince Congress to pass a $700B bailout bill, but then still, both men lack powers of persuasion. The former, an ex-Goldman Sachs CEO, reportedly knelt on one knee and begged Nancy Pelosi not to withdraw Democratic support for the bill. As the NYTimes wrote,

In the Roosevelt Room after the session, the Treasury secretary, Henry M. Paulson Jr., literally bent down on one knee as he pleaded with Nancy Pelosi, the House Speaker, not to “blow it up” by withdrawing her party’s support for the package over what Ms. Pelosi derided as a Republican betrayal.

“I didn’t know you were Catholic,” Ms. Pelosi said, a wry reference to Mr. Paulson’s kneeling, according to someone who observed the exchange. She went on: “It’s not me blowing this up, it’s the Republicans.”

Mr. Paulson sighed. “I know. I know.”

(Full article here)

It's hard to imagine a man of such fortune (reported $700 million in assets) and power to be such a poor leader and lacking in political tact. Kneeling? Really? And if you watched the Congressional hearings as I did, Paulson's political incompetence is even more evident. Repeatedly stating his claim that a $700B bailout was the only option, and offering no substantial and detailed rationale, he befriended and persuaded no one. He is Wall Street, not Main Street, and perhaps because he is blessed with Dubya's unfettered support, he feels no need to make his case to the public. If such is the case, maybe he's a more shrewd politician than I deem him to be.

It's difficult for me to come to grips with a $700B bailout plan, what it means, what it will do, and how the world economy will be affected. I'm not alone. I doubt many people (including Hank and Ben) are sure what will happen after pouring $700B into the market anyway. More liquidity and loosening of credit? Sure, maybe. Depreciation of the dollar and rising inflation? Likely. Stabilization of or even falling interest rates? Perhaps. My biggest question however, and one in which I invite your input, is what does the US government's interference with free markets mean for the greater economic system and America's long-standing stance on capitalism? Some have expressed their belief in the end of American capitalism and the dawn of socialism in the US, which I doubt, and perhaps the capital infusion and restructuring of the financial markets is an adjustment rather than an overhaul. I don't know.

One last note on the $700B bill is the air of urgency and fright that surrounds its reporting, most notably the constant references to "crisis" and "act now or else...". Dubya even says "
... our entire economy is in danger... Without immediate action by Congress, America can slip into a major panic."(CNN report)

I believe the economy is doing poorly (duh!), and $700B is a relatively small price to pay to aquire assets, albeit poor ones (mind you, it's not just giving cash away). But relative to the US's $500B annual military budget, a $700B plan to hopefully restore credit and liquidity and prevent further home foreclosures seem acceptable. However, I am more concerned with the Bush administration's fright tactics, ones that inevitably echo previous strategies behind the WMD's, granting of unchecked powers, and the invasion of Iraq.

Moving on...

I'm sure you're familiar with the animal rights activist, PETA - People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. You've probably even come across one of their many ads featuring gracefully nude but not revealing actresses championing the slogan "I'd rather go naked than wear fur." Yes, I'm a carnivore and enjoy my steak cooked medium-rare, and even though I'm not an avid PETA supporter, I can sympathize to some extent with their mission. However, their latest report in the news is a demand on ice-creamery Ben and Jerry's to use human breast milk as a substitute for cow milk in ice-cream production (report).
Sorry, but I just can't take that proposition seriously. Think about the logistics of that venture? I just see no reasonableness in it. Ironically, this report comes just as the China milk scandal is exploding. Don't we already have a breast milk shortage?

Lastly, if you've read through all of the above, I figure you deserve a reward. After all, you've just read a lot of nothing, and so in the spirit of any successful website, I offer you a piece of visual candy to conclude this post. Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you my new obsession - the Audi S5:


Be the first to buy me this sweet ride and I'll be your BFF. Really! And yes, friendship does have a price. =)

Monday, August 25, 2008

2008.08.26

(click to read)

Thursday, August 7, 2008

2008.08.08

i) Let the Games begin!



ii) Saw this image in the SCMP today:

The graphics is pleasing, but the event is rather disturbing. A China Airlines plane decided to abort a landing at HK Airport due to strong winds, and so pulls up 100m from the runway to make a detour back to Taipei. Amid high winds and only 100m above ground, is it really safer to fly back into the air (into the wind) as opposed to landing? I'm not a pilot and don't really understand the physics of landing a plane, but my gut instinct is a strong no.

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

Tuesday, August 5, 2008

2008.08.05 - ii

Historic Olympic medals count

2008.08.05

I invite you to read this Nytimes article (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/05/sports/olympics/05nest.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin) written by Nicolai Ouroussoff regarding the Beijing Olympic National Stadium and tell me your thoughts on his critique. Do you think his detailed, post-construction perspective accurately reflects the design objectives? Or do you think he, like most critics and art historians, attribute more qualities to the architecture than the architects' own intents?

Monday, August 4, 2008

2008.08.04

Madeira Funchal Airport Extension in Portugal: (images from designboom.com)

The elevated runway is simply amazing.


Sunday, August 3, 2008

2008.08.03

Welcome back. It's been a couple weeks since I updated this blog, and it just seemed like it's about time that I do so. The initial fervor and dedication with which I started this blog has undoubtedly faded a bit, although not for a lack of material. The past couple-weeks have given me plenty of inspiration and topics to write about. I've simply been away, and well, lazy.

On the agenda today: 1) elevators - the mobile vanity unit, 2) Shanghai subway transfer, and 3) the Nike Olympic Games


i) elevators - the mobile vanity unit (MVU)



In the study of architecture, probably not enough literature and thought has been given to the elevator - a wonderful invention that has made possible skyscrapers as well as the simpler task of moving a couch to a fourth floor apartment. We take them for granted of course, as they've been around for as long our memory can recall, and very few of us even acknowledge the fact that riding in an elevator means being suspended in a virtually bottomless chute. Yes, riding up to the 60th floor means there's 60-floors of nothingness below your feet. Sweet! As far as we know, the elevator cabin simply brings us from floors A to Z and back down. The ride is typically smooth and fail-safe, aside from a few glitches that may make you prisoner in the cell awaiting desperate rescue. But then again, there are the roof hatch and emergency call buttons. By all means, the elevator is a safe ride.

Yet, herein lies the missed opportunity in thinking about the elevator as simply a mode of transportation instead of a true architectural space. In fact, a large number of elevator cabins are drab, claustrophobic spaces that warrant little regards, but, as usual, Asia has yet again perfected the banal into an art form. Hong Kong can aptly be characterized as the City of Commerce, Shopping, Culinary Delight, etc., but I choose to label Hong Kong as the City of Reflections. The reflective surface covers all three dimensions of space in the city - from the polished marble floor, to the color-back glass walls, to the chrome ceilings. Reflections are an unavoidable part of the HK experience. Coupled with the people's infamous attention to beauty and image, naturally the combination finds itself manifested in the elevator mobile vanity unit - MVU.

The MVU is simple yet fantastically brilliant. Elevators in HK are thoroughly equipped with reflective surfaces from wall to wall. OL's (aka office ladies) take every opportunity to use the elevator as their private (actually quite public) vanity room - applying makeup, fixing their hair, and generally making sure every piece of their face and clothing is appropriately presentable. In fact, this practice is quite sensibly logical, saving time and maximizing efficiency. Plus it momentarily transforms a public mode of transit - the elevator - into an intimate experience of self-beautification. Other passengers onboard are invited to take in the sight as part of public entertainment, but be forewarned that explicit gazing may be reciprocated with a WTF-are-you-looking-at stare. Fixing one's face, afterall, is supposedly a private matter shielded from the public. Somehow, preservation of public space, even something as public as the elevator, remains one of the most difficult tasks of urban design and architecture.


ii) Shanghai subway transfer

As some of you may know, I spent a few days in Shanghai this past week, and used the extensive subway network as my primary means of transportation. It's fast, clean, and cheap. Trifecta! On one trip, I transferred from the green line (line 2) to the purple line (line 4) at Zhongshan Park station (中山公园). In typical fashion, the metro map shows the interchange like this (dash line showing my route):


Seeing that I've practiced changing subway lines numerous times before on subways throughout the world (including those in Shanghai), I figured getting from line 2 to 4 would just be like any other experience. But little did I know that switching lines at Zhongshan Park station, perhaps befitting its park name and encouragement for physical recreation, is as much a test in navigation as it is in physical fitness. Rather than the typical hop and a skip from one line to another, I trekked seemingly endlessly stair after stair. Only after I reached my destination did I gather that the trek must've looked something like this:

Yes, that is correct. Getting from line 2 to 4 required approximately 10 flights of stairs. S-T-A-I-R-S. In plan, the two lines simply overlap one over the other, but in section, voila - 10-flights of glutinus maximus toning workout.


iii) Nike Olympic Games

Olympic fever is picking up these days in China and even in Hong Kong. Better late than never I guess. Highlighting pre-Olympic events thus far, at least in Bho's world, are the USA Basketball exhibition games that have been played in nearby Macau and Shanghai. The US has a good chance at gold, but they haven't been as dominant as expected. Their interior defense is mostly absent, and their outside shooting (sans Michael Redd) is suspect at best. A team like Argentina can once again give them fits.

But sports analysis aside, one particular item caught my attention. While watching the USA vs Turkey game the other day, I was struck with a sudden sense of deja vu. No, the game wasn't on replay. What caught my eye were actually team USA's basketball jerseys designed and produced by Nike, and they bore an odd resemblance to team China's basketball jerseys also designed and produced by Nike.

The fronts bear enough dissimilarities to warrant them adequately different. Their trims are the same, but font and color are not. But check out the back:

At first (and second, and third, and fourth, and...) glance, I thought the backs of both jerseys sported an identical pattern. It wasn't until I started typing this blog entry that I realized the patterns are different, but for all intents and purposes, they're identical. No one in the right mind, especially during a fast-paced basketball event, will be able to differentiate the patterns from each other. So essentially Nike produced one jersey design for two rival competitors in the same event. And even more coincidentally, China and USA are placed in the same group for playoff seeding, and in fact the first match of men's basketball on Aug 10 is between these two teams. On one hand, you have the host nation and its throngs of loyal citizens, and on the other hand, presumably the world's most dominant basketball team and its legions of adoring fans. So what will game 1 visually look like on the court? Rather than identifying the game as China vs USA, the identical jerseys pose the risk of the game looking more like a Nike all-star contest between Red Team and Blue Team. Regardless of the score, Nike wins. I have no doubt this was a shrewdly calculated move on the part of Nike marketing, but then again I'm disappointed in Team China's approval of this jersey - one that implicitly and effectively represses national identity and pride in favor of Nike global dominance. I don't necessarily have a problem with corporate success, but it is highly irritating to find that Nike did not make an attempt to distinguish the two teams, and even more irritating to see Team China not reject what is clearly a Team USA outfit.

Friday, July 18, 2008

2008.07.18

More observations: 1) the hand-held, hands-free headset, and 2) China dogs regulation


i) the hand-held, hands-free headset

Cellphone headsets have been around for a while now. Whether wired or bluetooth, I think they're great. They free our hands to take care of more important business like driving. Yet even when I drive, I never use my headset. I simply don't pick up the phone. It's a distraction from the leisure of driving anyway.

But the headset has also assumed a prominent role as fashion accessory. Today I rediscovered the phenomenon of the hand-held, hands-free headset. Granted, people all over the world use headsets, but personally I think it's a much more common occurrence in Hong Kong for users to hold their mic piece up to their mouths even though it's designed as a hands-free device. While on the MTR (subway) ride, three people around me, both men and women, talked on their headsets in this manner. This habit can be broken down into two standard practices:



Exhibit 1 illustrates the classic hand-held, hands-fee headset technique. This is most common when the upper-body clothing article is not conducive for mic clipping, and also gives the bonus impression of a secret service agent.

Exhibit 2 illustrates the twice-redundant hand-held, hands-free headset technique. The user typically cannot make up his / her mind on which device to speak into, and so holds up both the phone and mic piece to his / her mouth. At times, said user does not actually place the phone up against their face, but rather hovers it in the general vicinity some 6-8 inches away. It's not so much the act of speaking into the phone, since the headset does the job anyway, but hoisting the phone triggers muscle memory, which further incites mental recognition of talking on the phone. This technique signifies to others that the user is in fact in conversation with someone else, not just talking randomly to themselves, and warns off potential psycho-stares.

Either technique is fine, since both are practices in redundancy, and if we're to be redundant, might as well do it in style.


ii) China dogs regulation

While in Beijing last year, I found out that taxes on pet ownership had been falling,
prompting many urban households to purchase their beloved dogs. In fact, year-on-year dog ownership rates in Beijing increased by 17.3% as reported by the South China Morning Post.

(p.s., the SCMP is my only source of local news here because, frankly, it's the only one available in English.
)

This rapid rate of increase has brought about a noise problem. A conservative solution may be to increase taxes on pet ownership to discourage people from buying dogs, reducing the population and potential noise levels. But c'mon now! Why be shy when one can be bold? The Chinese government has recently implemented a canine population control law in the form of... a HEIGHT LIMIT!

The new height limit is set at 35cm. Dogs in violation of said limit may be either locked up or put down. Not sure if or what penalties are leveraged on the owners.



Just when you thought such a measure only applies to buildings, apparently it can equally apply to animals. This measure was put in place because large dogs are perceived to generate more noise. No, we can't (morally at least) control how big dogs get or how much they bark, but of course, certain assumptions on dog size and volume level are at play here. I guess we'll see more of Paris Hilton and less of Snoop.


The SCMP also reports that:

"The ban is strictly enforced. Even a partially blind Paralympic medallist is unable to get her guide dog registered ahead of the Olympics, and the Paralympics in September, when she is due to run with the torch in the opening ceremony."

I wonder what other bold and ingenious strategies the Chinese can muster up when it has to deal with an increase in the number of stray dogs, all of which will undoubtedly be taller than 35cm. Perhaps to restrict their movement roaming around the city, the city will surprise us yet again with... a LIMBS LIMIT ? gosh...

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

2008.07.16 (part 2)

I couldn't help but add one more thing: CASH!

The Bank of China in Hong Kong put on sale commemorative Olympic-themed $20 bills today. Only 4 million notes will be issued. The two sides look like this:




Pricing for the sets range from HKD $138 for a single note to $1, 388 for a 35-in-1 uncut sheet.


I know very little about the hobby and industry of collecting commemorative notes, but exchanging $138 for $20 is 7-folds the product's monetary value, guaranteeing that these notes will never circulate publicly - ie, they're useless money. By some accounts, the immediate aftermarket already has these bills priced at 5x their purchase value, or 35x their monetary face value. And furthermore, 4 MILLION of these are issued, in a city of only 7 million people. If distributed equally, more than half of the city's residents could get their hands on one, or each household could potentially have 2-3. When viewed at from this angle, the supply-and-demand laws don't seem to justify the bill's value nor queuing up over a 48-hour period like this:



In any case, so are the economics of craze.

On a last side note, a couple weeks ago China also issued a new 10 Yuan bill that looks like this:



And yes, both the Chinese and Hong Kong bills feature the Bird's Nest stadium by my boys HdM, but they still have a ways to go before overtaking Corb's throne on printed money.


2008.07.16

Today's agenda: rumblings on (sub)urbanism, Zagat prose, and a new (?) word from the Chinglish dictionary

Before we get into the real content, I just want to express my gratitude to all those who have voiced their pleasure in reading and encouragement for my continued writing. Today's post is probably going to be a bit more dry with less wit to boot, but hang around anyway.

i) rumblings on (sub)urbanism.

I am trained as an architect, and perhaps more valuable than any lesson I've learned about making buildings, is that as an architect, it is our fundamental duty to dream. Don't get me wrong though. I am a pragmatic idealist. I believe in things that can actually be executed and accomplished, because that's the only path for change. Parametric whims bear no interest to me. And despite my plans and efforts to escape the architecture industry, my training and psyche will forever stay with me. In such, my interest in the built environment will most likely never change.

A week ago, I engaged in a conversation about the future of Chinese cities. China, and of course...


(After completing this part of my blog entry, I realized it was too long, somewhat incoherent, and probably too boring for the majority of you who aren't architects / urbanists - a trifecta for blog failure in our attention deficient society. And so I'm cutting it short, and including the rest as a link for your perusal only if it strikes your fancy.)




ii) Zagat prose.


I don't know why I'm writing about the Zagat restaurant guide. I haven't flipped through one in probably a year or so, but in the process of writing this blog, I have inadvertently given more thought to the process of writing as means of disseminating information, and how the internet has made public opinion accessible through blogs such as this one. User-generated content seems to be the fad these days, with good reason too of course, but perhaps (and I haven't checked my sources on this) a predecessor to blogs and online reviews is the print version of the famous Zagat surveys. I don't have a copy with me at the moment, but Zagat reviews typically read like this:

- The "owner of this place makes it all worth while". "She is a very kind" and "warm person". "The prices are good" and "the food is great". "It's place go to if you need some quick and good".

Notice the generous use of quotes. The Zagat survey, you see, is user-generated content. Zagat does not actually review the restaurants themselves, but rather receives and publishes customer opinion. What makes it facinating is that rather than publishing snipets of stand-alone quotes, Zagat edits and joins them into seamless sentences, presenting various user opinions as one. So while stand-alone quotes may be bulletpoints for browsing, their fusion as one sentence presents a tone of unity and authority, and I think is an imitable style of writing to make online user-generated content even more accessible. So rather than scouring through 86 reviews on Yelp, imagine all of that condensed into a much more concise format with the option to expand to include the full review. So with the sample quote from above, placing your cursor over any of the quotes will expand it to include the full review, and removing your cursor will make it disappear again. I bet there already are websites out there with this format in place, and if not, I call first dibs and all patents.


iii) a new (?) word from the Chinglish dictionary



As you may or may not know, a particular phenomenon that has emerged out of Hong Kong is the canto-based Chinglish dialect, a text-based and ad hoc pronunciation guide to mimic Chinese words. This is most often used in online chats where typing and reading Chinese characters may not be most convenient. My friends Jenny and Gary are my teachers in this most inaccurate language. There are essentially no rules and no consistencies. Improvisation reigns supreme. One's ability to converse in the language is confined only by one's imagination. Think about it as an equivalent to the hip hop vocabulary, where proper words such as "holler" becomes "holla" and "for sure" becomes "fosho". However, it's much more interesting when the task at hand is to translate Chinese characters into English sounding syllables. One example you may be familiar with is "Gui Lo" - standing for 鬼佬 - an often-used and perhaps even pejorative term that refers to westerners. But my friend Gary has taken this translation a step further, and in his Chinglish vocabulary now uses the term "Ghost Guy", which word-by-word literally translates to 鬼 (ghost) 佬 (guy), and of course the female equivalent 鬼 (ghost) (grandma).

We can get into this more and try to break down their meanings and why there's an apparent contradiction in the use of a term of reverence ("grandma") within the pejorative phrase of
婆 (western woman). But in any case, my interest for the moment is really only in the linguistic creativity that emerges out of the local conditions within a global language.

Saturday, July 12, 2008

2008.07.12

On today's agenda: Red Cliff 赤壁 (the movie), Miss HK Pageant (Part 2), Wedding photos (no, not mine, dumbass), and the iPhone 3G launch


1) Red Cliff 赤壁

I had the pleasure of watching Red Cliff last night, staring Tony Leung (梁朝偉) and Takeshi Kaneshiro (金城武). The movie really was quite a joy to watch, especially for those like me who know very little about Chinese history but have an unquenchable thirst for violent depictions of its military prowess. The scenes were beautiful, capturing vivid images of warfare, contemplation, lust, and struggle, and along the way, I learned a thing or two about China's history, however out of order, skewed, and popularized it may be. At least I now have a faint idea of the sequential order of the many dynasties, and the movie has even prompted me to search for a map tracing the political boundaries of the many dynasties throughout China's 4000 year history. I'm sure it exists out there. I just have to find it. If my efforts fail, I'll just compile and draw one myself with the abundance of free time that I have. But back to the movie. Despite the movie being a highly satisfying 2hrs and $60 well spent, I left with a bitter taste. The movie, you see, is called Red Cliff because it tells the story of the battle at Red Cliff, which by my understanding, is the last stand during the Han Dynasty circa 200 AD immediately preceding the emergence of the Three Kingdoms. I'm not a history buff and can't tell you more about the significance of this battle, but any battle that signifies the end of one and the beginning of another era is one worth noting. Yet despite the movie's name, the movie itself only builds up to the battle at Red Cliff, and doesn't continue to stage the epic battle!! Just when all the pieces were in place, the screen not-so-ceremoniously shows the words "to be continued...". Can you imagine my frustration with sitting through 2 hours of a movie to end up not being shown the scene for which the movie is named after? It'd be equivalent to a movie depicting the H-bomb in Hiroshima to never actually show how it happened or what ensued. I now have to wait until the sequel comes out, whenever that may be, and in the meantime am left grappling with the irritation of a truncated ending.


2) Miss HK Pageant (Part 2)

I realize pictures can be misleading (or how about Miss Leading, a la Miss Photogenic, Miss Congeniality, etc.?), and so compiled a second round of Miss HK candidate photos to continue my poll on who has the most potential to be crowned this year's winner.


After this second look, I've given my votes to #3, 5, and 8. What's your vote? Here's the tally thus far. Pink denotes round 1 votes, and white denotes round 2 votes.



3) Wedding Photos

Quite a few of my friends are now engaged, and so the topic of wedding planning is often discussed, with me as the quiet observer with nothing of value to add to the conversation. One piece of the wedding puzzle that has particularly caught my eye are wedding photos. I believe most people typically have a set shot to leave as a memory of their youth and their love. Great. But most of the time these photos try too hard to capture the essence of romance, leaving the soon-to-be newly weds as puppets at the photographer's mercy - a bad decision that often lends its way to photos like this one:
I don't know this couple and only found this image online as an example. But seriously now, is this how the couple truly wants to remember their wedding? The frail man falling wounded in the arms of his new bride? I don't think so.

But instead, let me draw your attention to this gem I found featuring my close friends Eko and Charissa. They're probably gonna kill me for putting this photo up, but THIS, is the pinnacle of wedding photo perfection:

Everything about this image is unequivocally
and unapologetically cool. They make no mistake in telling you they're badass! =)


4) iPhone 3G launch

Congrats to all you who bought your new iPhones. I'm tempted to get one myself, but my personal financial advisor is telling me not to. I might have to fire him soon.

I have no qualms against iPhone owners, no matter how many hours in line they stood and waited to get their hands on that newly minted gem. But I do have a problem with guys like this who wear a shirt with the word "Jealous?" written across the front as part of a calculated effort to make his way to fame as Hong Kong's first iPhone 3G owner (photo: South China Morning Post):

If Eko and Charissa's photo epitomized coolness, this photo should sit in the Webster-Merriam dictionary next to the word "Asshole".

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

2008.07.09 (part 2)

Just FYI, Hong Kong is currently hosting its Miss Hong Kong pageant. Below are the 12 candidates. I personally have my money on #8 and #9. How about you? Let's take a poll!


2008.07.09

I must say I'm a bit surprised at how quickly some of you have caught sight of my blog, and this popular initial reception, which I'm sure will not be sustained, has prompted me to write post numero deux. On today's agenda: the Olympics, and a recommendation for Gmail.

(Please be forewarned that this blog is my WRITING outlet, and even though I'm not particularly loquacious, this series of blogs will probably contain more words than you might want to read. And no, this isn't a diary, and so I won't be posting many personal pics here. That's what facebook is for.)

The Olympics.

I am in the fortunate position that the next two Olympic Games will take place in cities close to my heart: Beijing and Vancouver, and so I've probably grown to pay more attention to the Games now than ever before. Last year in Beijing, despite the Games being more than a year away, one could not escape Olympic-mania. I haven't visited the Mainland yet this year, and so I can only assume that the craze has only heated up even more. The Games are city-specific, not country-specific, meaning that the 2010 Winter Games in Vancouver will take place in Vancouver and its vicinity, not branch out to other Canadian cities. This year, for the 2008 Games, Beijing and the IOC granted Hong Kong (some 2000 kilometers away) the right to host the equestrian events. I consider this an honor and a privilege. Yet unlike its brethens in the Mainland, Hong Kong has essentially demonstrated no Olympic spirit. Aside from a large Olympic logo on Victoria harbour and a few TV plugs by not-so-famous celebrities, the city really isn't sporting the same type of festivity and excitement as can be found in Beijing. In fact,
a couple nights ago, I saw a commercial on TV featuring horse races and events, and naturally figured that was an ad to promote the Olympics. Then at the end, realized it was only an ad for the Hong Kong Jockey Club, the de facto gambling authority. Given, HK is hosting only one event, not the entire games, but still, wouldn't one take this opportunity to showcase and promote one's city, whether for cultural, social, or financial intents? Why this city has remained so passive in this regards is beyond my understanding, and frankly, has been disappointing.

On another Olympic-related note, I saw this image in the South China Morning Post today:

Apparently both photos are the exact same view taken from the same spot on two different days. Seriously now! People are BREATHING that!

(And on a side note, it's nice to see CCTV's skin edging towards completion.)

Moving onto a recommendation for Gmail.

I'll keep this short, but can the engineers at Google please allow a date-search capability? So when I want to look for an email from a year ago, I don't have to keep on clicking "Older"? Plus the option to click "Oldest" really isn't that useful is it? Let's get rid of something that's useless, and replace it with something useful, please. Aside from that, I'm glad to see I've only used 1/3 of my 6.9 GB of storage space. Keep up the good work!

Monday, July 7, 2008

Post 2008.07.07

Today seems an apt day to begin a blog. Why? Because it's just as good as any other day. I can't really find a logical reasoning behind choosing the date of a blog's grand opening. Today is as good as any other day.

This isn't my first blog. Some of my close followers may recall a blog i kept 2 years ago while working in Rotterdam. That was a simple blog. Essentially I wrote a weekly top-ten list of observations, documenting peculiarities in my daily life from my supermarket routine to some of the insane hours I put into work. This blog however, is somewhat inspired by my brother Duy Ho's blog, and a blog my thesis partners and I (mostly Yusun) kept during my last semester at the GSD (found here: http://nairobics.blogspot.com/). It is my hope and intent that this blog will allow my friends from all over the world to keep in touch with me, however loosely, and to give them a window into life in Hong Kong / China.

As the inaugural post, I actually do not have much to say. I can ramble on about my self-prolonged, boredom-induced jetlag, or I could complain about the many things about Hong Kong that have irritated me thus far. But these observations have not yet had the benefit of time, and I'm afraid blogging these thoughts will later turn out to be a miscalculated misreading (double negative?). So rather than bgein my corner in cyberspace with reflections, I will outline an incomprehensive list of topics of interest that for certain will follow in the months (years?) ahead:

1 - beauty
2 - efficiency
3 - headline news & peculiar oddities
4 - language
5 - culture clashes
6 - my adventures in a new career
7 - the economy
8 - sports
9 - rumblings on architecture from a nostalgic ex-architect

And with that, I give you the beginnings of more cyberspace pollution, a blog that will undoubtedly find its way into internet oblivion. Or perhaps this collection of thoughts and short essays will gather steam and a loyal following, prompting its widespread publication into print form. We will never know, and that's why we try.